🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest is no longer a basic freedom. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that those in power allow or deny as they see fit. This constitutes the implication of proposed measures that the current government is advancing, which would dictate when and where demonstrations can take place, with potential prison sentences for those who defy these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous administrations had already weakened this fundamental freedom: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement extensive new authorities, which global rights bodies had censured as "serious and unjustified restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these progressive attacks on freedom have effectively abolished the historically earned right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Atrocity to Rationalize Suppression

The most recent limitations are being justified by citing last week's terrible antisemitic assault on a Manchester mosque. We can all agree on universal agreement that the safety of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, using this horrific incident as a justification to suppress opposition is not only disconnected to that duty but perverts it.

"When you can't set boundaries at genocide, you probably can't draw the line at democratic principles," observed a well-known American author, whose words that rings true for the current government.

Historical Context of Protest

Reflect on Britain's rich history of public demonstration and activism against racial discrimination and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these historical demonstrators were branded as extremists in their time, even while they were advocating the rights of marginalized groups.

Present Situation

In the current complicated landscape, here's what's actually happening: Israel – a foreign state – is committing acts that international bodies have described as systematic destruction. Its military actions have led the global justice body to release legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

International popular sentiment has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of citizens believe Israel has probably committed war crimes. Most people would support a total prohibition on arms sales to the state, and back the detention of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having largely failed the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now seizing on a vile antisemitic crime to attempt to silence a mass movement against a ethical disaster. The British government seems included in this effort. Ministers have not enacted comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted arms exports to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to intervene.

Dangerous Conflation

Merging Jewish identity with the policies of the Israeli state is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The official definition of anti-Jewish prejudice, accepted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been appropriately challenged for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've arrived at a point where law enforcement can propose that demonstrations opposing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "accidentally or deliberately" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have declared that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "complicit" in alleged abuse faced by Jewish communities.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – increasing the terrible count from two years of ongoing violence that have claimed tens of thousands of human lives. British politicians and news organizations have hardly hidden the limited value they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest expressions of racism in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a dangerous boundary by banning Palestine Action, a peaceful, anti-genocide activist collective. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, mostly for holding placards against mass killing and supporting the banned organization. Many of those arrested are pensioners; among them a former clergyman and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker implied that some were "linked with" other nations, while the sitting leader characterized such protests as anti-Jewish. In taking these actions, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to suppress dissent. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears struggled, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to secure our freedoms. We may ultimately regret how easily we allowed them to be eroded.