🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

Campaign in Zambia

Documents seen by journalists originating from the corporation's branch in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands measures restricting tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be scrapped or postponed.

The company is attempting amendments to a draft bill that include decreasing the proposed size of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on scented cigarette varieties, and reduced sanctions for any companies violating the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“If I was a politician, I would say that they allow the safeguarding of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

Chimbala said the letter was understood to have been copied to several government departments and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

This occurs during broader worries about industry interference with medical guidelines. Recently, WHO officials raised concerns that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to undermine international regulations.

“We see evidence of business advocacy worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN high-level meeting,” said the corporate monitoring director.

Possible outcomes

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in lives of people who might potentially stop smoking.”

The tobacco control bill being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by extending coverage to e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Through correspondence, the company recommends this be reduced to thirty to fifty percent “according to global guideline limits”, delayed for at least 12 months after the legislation is approved.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a alert needs to encompass at least 50% of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the principal display areas as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a product container sides.

Flavored tobacco discussion

BAT asks for the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavoured tobacco products, claiming that it would lead smokers to “illegally traded” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation recommends punishments for multiple violations “ranging from a portion of yearly revenue to a decade in prison”.

Business explanation

Via documentation, the managing director of the Zambian branch claims the firm is “committed to ethical business practices” and “supports the objectives of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but claims that “certain measures can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions existed in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “total double standard”, he commented.

“We live in a international community. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and gather the crop and sell it out – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself total emotional collapse.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the UK or elsewhere had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Regulations don't close the industry. Measures simply defend the people.”

Formal company response

A BAT Zambia spokesperson said: “The corporation runs its operations according with applicable local laws. Additionally, the company participates in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The corporation remained “not opposed to regulation”, the representative commented, mentioning that young individuals should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We support progressive regulation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while recognizing the range of entitlements and duties on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” they said, adding that the company's suggestions “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and smoking product business, which includes rising levels of black market activity”.

Zambia’s department of business, commercial affairs and industrial development was solicited for statement.