🔗 Share this article

Nicolas Cage could be the ideal choice for a audacious scary movie focused on Jesus Christ, however not for the motivations certain viewers might assume. Actually, Cage does not even act as the central religious figure in The Carpenter’s Son: his character is referred to merely as The Carpenter. Cage is framed as a father figure in this narrative, working to keep his religious convictions while the teenage character (portrayed by Noah Jupe), his now-teenage adopted son, begins to exhibit divine powers. Why it's challenging to picture another prominent performer playing this part is that although his character becomes stricken with numerous trials, the actor appears practically emotionally certain that this murky, somber feature is worth his time.

Cage's Latest Career Choices

Cage has allocating his time more selectively lately. He continues to does additional projects than most casual fans could possibly view — for instance, were you informed that the actor has made a trio of different frontier films over the last few years? — yet he also mixes in esteemed A24/Neon gigs such as one recent hit, another notable movie, and Longlegs. This new film seems like a similar project, in that it’s not strictly scary, potentially provocative, and handles a over-the-top premise in a earnest manner.

The Film's Storyline and Execution

Unfortunately, filmmaker Lotfy Nathan fails to repay viewer engagement. The film begins with a compellingly nomadic place, presented as inspired by an unknown scripture about the early years of Jesus. The Carpenter, The Mother, and their child relocate constantly, fearful of doctrinal intolerance or suspicion regarding The Boy’s mysterious gifts. “Calamity follows us,” The Carpenter gloomily remarks. It goes on as sinister entities focus on them in their latest settlement, beginning with that well-known scriptural test for The Boy.

Sometimes, the movie echoes an Exorcist-style supernatural thriller, but not one of the central roles are directly possessed. On the contrary, they are progressively isolated from each other, as these forces affect a local young woman (Isla Johnston, named an outsider) who The Boy connects to, and provides each character troubling visions of a dark tomorrow. Cage's role notably grapples with his position within the plot, at times berating his child who mystifies him.

Controversy and Sensitivity

The content is likely to court controversy, and the director handles it with plenty of sensitivity — too much, possibly. The idea of a young man dealing with his eventual sacrifice and seduced by mysterious forces is truly scary, but the filmmaker may be wary of seeming gratuitous and keen to signal his intentions, therefore he regularly withdraws to darkly ominous visuals. The figures constantly ponder — the singer-actress, who showed real promise in another movie, of all things — surrenders her acting to her Mother Mary cloak, at times punctuated by several gruesome scary visuals.

Cage's Portrayal and Movie's Weaknesses

Meanwhile, Cage dabbles in just the sort of exaggerated performance that his more snickering appreciators might be looking for. There is a moment (also included) in previews in which he loses control and yells “I’ve lost my faith!” When this sort of dramatic explosion is part of your biblical thriller, maybe a more openly absurd approach would take better advantage of his eagerness to be extreme when necessary. On the other hand, the film more closely resembles the less successful straight-to-DVD productions the actor filmed over the last decade — apart from the B-movies so much as the dramas and paranormal movies that often seem intriguing, and usually have some select Cage moments, but finally come across like, frankly, cheap home video fare.

Honestly, several of these, although simpler, were more watchable in general. Here is where I need to break my personal rule, not religious but career-related: Long ago, a beloved editor convinced me to remove words like “tedious” or “uninteresting” from my analytical lexicon. These words convey little except a individual and broadly stated lack of patience, disengaging from the duty of vibrantly communicating the mental and feeling of watching an individual production. It’s difficult to communicate tedium without seeming uninteresting personally. It's equally vague as labeling a movie “interesting.” “Say more,” in other words.

Yet, I acknowledge, I grew weary during much of The Carpenter’s Son. On the positive side, it is a religious style of boredom, not because The Carpenter’s Son is preachy, but because it demands a type of patient acceptance to view it. Eventually early on, the movie settles into a repetitive rhythm of ongoing suffering, and never really